Joint Degree between GSU and Another Institution

Joint Degree Program: Single degree program with collaborating units sharing responsibility for curricular offerings and program administration. Approval processes for new joint degree programs are the same as for all new degree programs. Joint programs are distinct from dual degree programs.

NEW DEGREE PROGRAM OFFERED JOINTLY

Proposals for new degree/major programs offered jointly through a partnership of GSU academic units and those of another institution follows the process for new degree programs.

Note: The full extent of the collaboration between the partner units and institutions should be clearly articulated in a program agreement. The program agreement should include the body of the new degree proposal, as well and any information required by the originating institutions. The program agreement must also address SACSCOC accreditation compliance requirements detailed in the Collaborative Academic Agreements Policies and Procedures.

EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAM OFFERED JOINTLY

Proposals for existing degree/major programs offered jointly through a new partnership of GSU academic units and those of another institution should follow the process below.

Note: The full extent of the collaboration between the partner units and institutions should be clearly articulated in a program agreement. The program agreement should include responses to the prompts below, as well and any information required by the originating institutions. The program agreement must also address SACSCOC accreditation compliance requirements detailed in the Collaborative Academic Agreements Policies and Procedures.

Proposal Format

Proposals should include the information below, as well as any items required by the originating department or college.

  • Program title
  • Collaborating departments, colleges, institutions. Include location of partner institution.
  • Lead faculty member for each collaborating academic unit, with department, email address, and phone number
  • Date of submission
  • Implementation term
  • Program description and objectives
  • Complete program curriculum (i.e., catalog copy)
  • Location(s) of program. Indicate percentage of credit hours that will be earned through instruction by GSU.
  • Describe methods of assessing and monitoring courses and components completed through instruction by partner institutions, including the qualifications of the personnel with these responsibilities.
  • Evidence of the need for and interest in this program, including projected enrollments.
  • Anticipated impact on other programs within the offering department, the college, or the university.
  • Additional resource requirements, if any, and budget implications (e.g., personnel costs, library acquisitions, computing/equipment costs, facilities and other operating costs, graduate student support). Intended method of funding additional costs if any.
  • Administration of the program.
  • Process for admitting students to the program.
  • Advisement process and resources for students in the program.
  • Strategies for ensuring adequate communication among the collaborating units.
  • Measures that will be taken to assess the effectiveness of the program.
  • Offices, departments, committees, and individuals consulted during the development of the proposal.
  • Approval path for program proposal, noting all formal department- or college-level votes.

Approval Process

The approval process for proposals consists of the steps below.

  1. Proposals should be considered and approved by the originating GSU department, as well as by the collaborating unit at the partner institution. Approval by the institutions at this stage, including any formal vote, should be noted as specified in the program proposal.
  2. Proposals require the approval of the dean of the GSU college that would be responsible for the administration of the new program, as well as of the appropriate official from the partner institution. The college may elect to require that proposals first be reviewed or formally considered by college faculty, a college undergraduate or graduate committee, or some other college-level body. Approval by at this stage, including any formal votes, should be noted as specified in the program proposal.
  3. The dean should send approved proposals to the chair of the University Senate Committee on Academic Programs. Within CAP, the proposal initially will be deliberated on by a subcommittee, most typically the Undergraduate Council or Graduate Council (depending on the level of the program being considered). The subcommittee chairs will include the Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness (APIE) in the dissemination of proposals to committee members. The Associate Provost for International Affairs should be included if the proposal involves collaboration with an international partner institution. The Graduate College dean should be included if the proposal involves graduate programs. These university administrators may request that notable issues be addressed before subcommittee review commences, or they may provide feedback on the proposal as part of the subcommittee review process to be addressed before the final proposal goes to the full committee for further review.
  4. The subcommittee may elect to invite the proposing parties to attend a meeting at which the proposal is discussed. The subcommittee will then make a recommendation to CAP. At a meeting to which the proposing parties will be invited, CAP will deliberate and vote on the proposal. At both the subcommittee and full committee levels, requests may be made to the proposing parties for changes to be made to the proposal.
  5. The chair of CAP will notify the APIE in writing of the recommendation of CAP.
  6. The chair of CAP will notify the Vice Provost and the Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness in writing of the recommendation of CAP.
  7. If any aspect of the proposed program constitutes a substantive change by BOR or SACSCOC standards, the university may be required to submit additional notifications or seek approval from either or both of these bodies. In such cases, the proposing units may be required to provide additional program information.
  8. The provost, on behalf of the university president, will make the final decision on implementation of the new program.
  9. If the provost’s recommendation is positive, he or she will notify the University System of Georgia (USG) offices of the university’s decision and will forward the program proposal to the USG for reference.
  10. Normally, the program can be officially added to the university curriculum (i.e., added to the record of official programs in the Banner system) after final university approval. (The APIE will send a copy of the official University System acknowledgement to the originating college(s) and the chair of CAP upon receipt.)

Program Policies & Resources

See Also:

Academic Affairs Handbook 2.3.10